John the turner Ward Jr.1
#11364, (say 1631 - 1683/84)
| | Sgt. John known as John Sr. to distinguish him from John Jr., the Turner, not his son.2 |
Birth* | say 1631 | He was born say 1631.1 |
Marriage* | circa 1650 | He married Sarah Hills, daughter of William Hills and Phyllis Lyman, circa 1650.3 |
| 1666/67 | He of Branford was a signer of The Newark Covenant in 1666/67; The Newark Covenant.4,5 |
| June 1683 | He left a will in June 1683.6 |
Death* | 1683/84 | He died in 1683/84 at New JerseyG.3 |
Probate* | 16 July 1684 | His estate was probated on 16 July 1684 at New JerseyG.6 |
Citations
- [S1088] Richard W. Cook, "John Warde and John Warde of Newark", Genealogical Magazine of New Jersey 57 (1982): 61, "John Ward, turner, son of George Ward of Branford."
- [S928] William H Shaw, compiler, History of Essex and Hudson Counties, New Jersey (Philadelphia: Everts & Peck, 1884), 367.
- [S1088] Richard W. Cook, "John Warde and John Warde of Newark", 61.
- [S928] William H Shaw, History of Essex and Hudson Counties, I:372–381.
The covenant came after years of planning and negotiating by New Haven Colony dissidents opposed to the union with the Connecticut Colony. The covenant was first signed, on 30 Oct 1666, by the Branford members, twenty-three in number:
1. Jasper Crane 13. Ebenezer Camfield
2. Abra. Peirson. 14. John Ward, Senior
3. Sam'l Swaine 15. Ed. Ball
4. Laurance Ward 16. John Harrison
6. Thomas Blacthly* 17. John Crane
6. Samuel Plum 18. Thos. Huntington
7. .losiah Ward 19. Delivered Crane
8. Samuel Rose 20. Aaron Blacthly
9. Thomas Peirson 21. Richard Laurence
10. John Warde 22. John Johnson
11. John Catling 23. Thomas L. Lyon [his mark]
12. Richard Harrison
This was followed on 24 Jun 1667 by the subscription to the document by forty-one members from Milford:
1. Robert Treat. 22. Thom. Johnson
2. Obadiah Bruen. 23. John Curtis.
3. Matthew Camfield 24. Ephraim Burwell.
4. Samuell Kitchell 25. Robert R. Dennison. [his mark]
5. Jeremiah Pecke 26. Nathaniel Wheeler.
6. Michael Tompkins 27. Zachariah Burwell.
7. Stephen Freeman 28. William Campe.
8. Henry Lyon, 29. Joseph Walters.
9. John Browne 30. Robert Dalglish.
10. John Rutgers [Rogers]. 31. Hauns Albers.
11. Stephen Davis. 32. Thomas Morris.
12. Edward Rigs. 33. Hugh Roberts.
13. Robert Kitchell 34. Eph'm Pennington
14. J. n. Brooks [his mark]. 35. Martin Tichenor
15. Robert v. Lymens. [his mark] 36. John Browne, Jr
16. Francis f. Linle. [his mark] 37 Jona. Seargeant.
17. Daniel Tichenor. 38. Azariah Crane
18. John Bauldwin, Sen. 39. Samuel Lyon.
19. John Bauldwin, Jr. 40. Joseph Riggs.
20. Jona. Timipkins. 41. Stephen Bond
21. Geo. Day
The document read thus:
"1st. - That none shall lie admitted freemen or free Burgesses within our Town upon Passaick River, in the Province of Jersey, but such Planters as are members of some or other of the Congregational Churches, nor shall any but such be chosen to Magistracy or to Carry on any part of said Civil Judicature, or as deputies or assistants, to have power to Vote in establishing Laws, and making or repealing them, or to any Chief Military Trust or Office. Nor shall any But such Church Members have any Vote in such election. Tho all others admitted to be planters have right to their proper Inheritance, and do and shall enjoy all other Civil Liberties, Privileges, according to all Laws, Orders, Grants which are, or hereafter shall be made for this Town."
- [S1084] Francis Bazley Lee, editor, Genealogical and Memorial History of the State of New Jersey (New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company, 1910), I:243. General description of the removal to New Jersey by those in Branford and Milford.
- [S1088] Richard W. Cook, "John Warde and John Warde of Newark", 62, will dated June 1683, proved 26 Jul 1684; GMHNJ and DRCHNJ XXIII have proved 16 Jul 1684.
- [S1088] Richard W. Cook, "John Warde and John Warde of Newark", 62, citing "Branford Vital Records" in TAG XII; not named by Cook, but included by Lee in GMHNJ I, are Nathaniel and Caleb. Cook makes the comment: "Other children have been assigned to John Ward, turner, but there seems to be no evidence to substantiate their inclusion."